Selecting or changing an IT provider
Support needs to change, but the next agreement is still a list of frustrations. Planning names what the business needs covered before a vendor writes the proposal.
Technology Advisory
A technology change is easier to direct before a vendor's proposal becomes the plan. Planning settles what the business actually needs, which approaches are realistic, and what a vendor should be asked to answer.
Situations
Planning fits a change that is still ahead of you, while the requirements or the approach are open.
Support needs to change, but the next agreement is still a list of frustrations. Planning names what the business needs covered before a vendor writes the proposal.
Email, files, or a line-of-business application need to move, or a new system is under consideration. The useful work is deciding what must carry over, what can wait, and which approaches are realistic, before a product demo sets the requirements.
A network, server, or cloud change is coming, and the scope is still a conversation. Planning turns that conversation into constraints: what has to keep running, who will support the result, and what the project is not trying to solve.
Vendors are about to be asked for designs, or proposals have started to arrive. Planning writes the requirements first, then reads each proposal against those requirements rather than against the vendor's preferred design.
Process
The scope is agreed before the work starts. A planning engagement can include:
Deliverable
The deliverable is agreed with the scope. It is written so you can use it:
A proposal that is already on the table is a different question. That is anIT proposal review. Uncertainty about the systems you already have belongs in atechnology assessment.
How to get started
A short note is enough: what is being considered, what is still undecided, and any deadline that matters. I typically reply within two business days to discuss scope and next steps.
Discuss a plan